MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Elgrand » 2016

Nissan Elgrand MOT Results

Registered in 2016
58.7% pass rate
from 610 tests in 2021
(170% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Elgrand is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (64 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (64 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.98% fail on Electrical equipment (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Battery(ies) (36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.66% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (140 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (163 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
  • 14% fail on Suspension (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (45 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (59 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover (35 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (66 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (47 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
  • 13% fail on Brakes (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (52 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.82% fail on Service brake imbalance (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.33% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (93% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (79% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Spark ignition (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.33% fail on Emission control equipment (56 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Catalytic converter (67 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Joints (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Other passenger's door (33 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Door condition (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.33% fail on Spare wheel (241 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Spare wheel condition (379 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Body (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear (41 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack (43 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.49% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering (120 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Other components (498 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.16% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages