Nissan Elgrand MOT Results

Registered in 2015
57.8% pass rate
from 490 tests in 2021
(130% worse than other 2015 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Elgrand is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (45 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (45 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (45 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.82% fail on Individual direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies) (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Position lamp
  • 18% fail on Suspension (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (32 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (41 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (49 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (44 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (29 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (20 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.82% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (371 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.61% fail on Sub-frames (49 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (30 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (11 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.82% fail on Service brake performance (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (22 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (21 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.41% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Spark ignition (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (19 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.61% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (60% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Seats (28 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Passenger's seat (68 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (344 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel condition (482 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.20% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.20% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.20% fail on Chassis
      • 0.20% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.20% fail on Towbar
      • 0.20% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Locking devices (178 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.82% fail on Steering gear (16 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Steering rack (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering (49 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Rams
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas (283 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
    • 0.41% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.61% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.61% fail on Attachment
  • 0.41% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages