Nissan Elgrand MOT Results

Registered in 2010

71.6% pass rate

from 405 tests in 2021

(20% better than other 2010 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Elgrand is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 9.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 9.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 9.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.2% fail on Headlamp
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.99% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.25% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.25% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
11% fail on Suspension
- 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.99% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.5% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.74% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.74% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
9.1% fail on Brakes
- 5.2% fail on Brake performance
  - 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.7% fail on Rbt
      - 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt
      - 0.99% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.2% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.49% fail on Brake discs
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.49% fail on Pedal
- 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.25% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 0.25% fail on Other braking system component
5.9% fail on Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Washers
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.25% fail on View to rear
  - 0.25% fail on Mirrors
3.5% fail on Steering
- 2.5% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.49% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Operation
  - 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.49% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.25% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.25% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.25% fail on Steering arm
- 0.25% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.25% fail on Steering play
  - 0.25% fail on Steering rack
3.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.99% fail on Transmission
  - 0.49% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.49% fail on Joints
  - 0.49% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.25% fail on Prop shaft
    - 0.25% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.25% fail on Bumpers
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.25% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.25% fail on Seats
  - 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
3.5% fail on Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Requirements
  - 0.25% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 1.7% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.99% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
0.74% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.74% fail on Registration plates
0.74% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.74% fail on Attachment