MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Elgrand » 2009

Nissan Elgrand MOT Results

Registered in 2009
71.8% pass rate
from 301 tests in 2021
(25% better than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Elgrand is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Axles
      • 0.33% fail on Axle
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
    • 1.00% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.66% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (45 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.33% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.66% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.00% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.00% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
  • 4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.00% fail on Transmission
      • 0.66% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.33% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.33% fail on Joints
    • 1.00% fail on Body (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Other body component (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Chassis (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis condition (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.66% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.33% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.66% fail on Steering play (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Steering rack (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Requirements
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.66% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.33% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.66% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.66% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.66% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.66% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages