Nissan Elgrand MOT Results

Registered in 1997
53.3% pass rate
from 321 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Elgrand is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (77% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms (74% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Springs
      • 0.31% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.31% fail on Mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.62% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 25% fail on Brakes (90% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.31% fail on Servos
      • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.62% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Switch
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.62% fail on Horn
      • 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors (16 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
      • 1.9% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Prop shaft (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Bearing housing (179 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.62% fail on Towbar
      • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.62% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Body condition
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component
    • 0.31% fail on Chassis
      • 0.31% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.31% fail on Floor
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.31% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.8% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Locking devices (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
    • 0.31% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.31% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
      • 0.31% fail on Requirements
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (47% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.93% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.93% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.93% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages