Nissan Cube MOT Results
Registered in 201767.4% pass rate
from 86 tests in 2021
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cube is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(97 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(97 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (97 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(97 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
(8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
(8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(663 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (813 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp
-
1.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.2% fail on Position lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
14% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(97 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
-
2.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(16 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (95 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brakes
-
3.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Road Wheels
(13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.2% fail on Joints
-
1.2% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp