MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » Cube » 2016

Nissan Cube MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.6% pass rate
from 105 tests in 2021
(100% worse than other 2016 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cube is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (75 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (76 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rear fog lamp (76 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.95% fail on Stop lamp
  • 9.5% fail on Suspension (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Ball joint (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.6% fail on Brakes (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (38 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Chassis
      • 0.95% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.95% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.95% fail on Pipe
    • 0.95% fail on Transmission
      • 0.95% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.95% fail on Joints
    • 0.95% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.95% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.95% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.95% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.95% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages