Nissan Cube MOT Results

Registered in 2008
69.9% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2008 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cube is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.58% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.58% fail on Switch
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.58% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.58% fail on Springs
      • 0.58% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.58% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.58% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt
          • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Body
      • 0.58% fail on Panel
    • 0.58% fail on Floor
  • 2.9% fail on Visibility
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Window
    • 0.58% fail on View to rear
      • 0.58% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres (82% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages