Nissan Cube MOT Results
Registered in 200869.9% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2008 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cube is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.58% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.58% fail on Switch
- 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.58% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(15 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.58% fail on Linkage
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.58% fail on
Springs
- 0.58% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.58% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.58% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.4% fail on
Brakes
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.2% fail on Lever
- 0.58% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Chassis
(8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Chassis condition (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Body
- 0.58% fail on Panel
- 0.58% fail on Floor
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 1.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.58% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.58% fail on Window
-
0.58% fail on
View to rear
- 0.58% fail on Mirrors
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.2% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Tyres
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition