Nissan Cube MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.0% pass rate
from 66 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Cube is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 15% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Switch (81 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.6% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 6.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 6.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Size/type (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Driver's door
        • 1.5% fail on Catch
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.5% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
  • 3.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.5% fail on Steering play
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages