Nissan Bluebird MOT Results

Registered in 1989
58.3% pass rate
from 127 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Bluebird is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.79% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.1% fail on Rear
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.6% fail on Tie bars/rods (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (111 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.79% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.79% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.79% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 0.79% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.9% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.79% fail on Pedal
        • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 8.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.79% fail on Pipe
      • 0.79% fail on Cap
  • 8.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.79% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Size/type
    • 0.79% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system
      • 3.1% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.79% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.79% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.79% fail on Chassis
    • 0.79% fail on Body security
    • 0.79% fail on Doors
      • 0.79% fail on Passengers other
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.79% fail on Towbars
    • 0.79% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages