Nissan Bluebird MOT Results

Registered in 1989

63.5% pass rate

from 104 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Bluebird is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Suspension
- 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.96% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.96% fail on Linkage
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.96% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.96% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.96% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.96% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.96% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
13% fail on Brakes
- 8.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 7.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 6.7% fail on Rbt
      - 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
      - 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.96% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.96% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.96% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.96% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.96% fail on Rbt
      - 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.96% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.96% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.96% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.96% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.9% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 2.9% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.9% fail on Position lamps
  - 1.9% fail on Position lamp
- 0.96% fail on Stop lamp
9.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 5.8% fail on Transmission
  - 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    - 5.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.96% fail on Doors
  - 0.96% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.96% fail on Door condition
  - 0.96% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.96% fail on Door condition
8.7% fail on Visibility
- 6.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 0.96% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.96% fail on Windscreen
2.9% fail on Steering
- 1.9% fail on Steering gear
  - 1.9% fail on Steering rack
- 0.96% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.96% fail on Track rod end
2.9% fail on Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.96% fail on Condition
1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.96% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.96% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.96% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.96% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
0.96% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.96% fail on Registration plates
0.96% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.96% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.96% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.96% fail on Condition