Nissan Almera MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.2% pass rate
from 1,263 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.48% fail on Horn
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.079% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.48% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.079% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.079% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.079% fail on Cable
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.79% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.079% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.079% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.079% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.079% fail on Other braking system component
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Transmission
      • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.079% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.079% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.2% fail on Body (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.16% fail on Bracket (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Seats
      • 0.32% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
      • 0.079% fail on Tank
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.079% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
      • 0.079% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.16% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.16% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (91% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Coil spring (71% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.79% fail on Anti-roll bars (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joints (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Axles
      • 0.079% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.079% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.48% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.079% fail on Window
    • 0.32% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (36% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.079% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.079% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 0.48% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
    • 0.87% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Steering (43% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.079% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.079% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.079% fail on Pump
    • 0.079% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.079% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages