Nissan Almera MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.2% pass rate
from 455 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.44% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.44% fail on Joints
    • 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Chassis (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.66% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Boot lid (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Boot lid condition (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
  • 20% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.22% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.66% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.3% fail on Seat belts (98% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.66% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.22% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages