Nissan Almera MOT Results
Registered in 199949.2% pass rate
from 455 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.44% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.44% fail on Joints
-
11% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.66% fail on Floor (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Boot lid
(12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Boot lid condition (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.22% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.22% fail on
Body
- 0.22% fail on Panel
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
-
0.22% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.22% fail on Door condition
-
0.22% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(34% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.88% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.66% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.22% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.88% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.66% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
-
4.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(92% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.22% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.22% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.22% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.22% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.22% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.66% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.66% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.4% fail on Washers
-
0.22% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.22% fail on Windscreen
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
(98% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements
- 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.3% fail on
Seat belts
(98% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.66% fail on Size/type
-
2.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(71% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.22% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(67% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
2.0% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.0% fail on Steering rack
-
2.0% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates