Nissan Almera MOT Results
Registered in 199854.8% pass rate
from 383 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 1998 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan Almera is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(92% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 10% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.52% fail on Joints
-
10% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Chassis
- 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.78% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.26% fail on Pipe
-
0.52% fail on
Body
- 0.26% fail on Body condition
- 0.26% fail on Panel
-
0.26% fail on
Towbar
- 0.26% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.26% fail on
Doors
-
0.26% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
-
0.26% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
-
0.26% fail on
Driver's door
-
11% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.52% fail on
Springs
-
0.52% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.52% fail on Coil spring
-
0.52% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.52% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.26% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.26% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.26% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.52% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(84% better than other 1998 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 1998 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
- 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
-
0.52% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.52% fail on Brake discs
-
1.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.78% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
0.78% fail on
Prescribed areas
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Hand lever
-
0.26% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.78% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.52% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.52% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Wipers (72% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
0.26% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.26% fail on Windscreen
-
0.26% fail on
View to rear
- 0.26% fail on Mirrors
-
6.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(68% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.52% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.78% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.52% fail on
Emission control equipment
(10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.26% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.52% fail on
Emission control equipment
(10 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
-
2.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.6% fail on Steering rack
-
0.78% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.52% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Track rod end
-
0.26% fail on
Power steering
- 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
1.6% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.26% fail on Belt(s)/padding