MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Nissan » 370Z » 2010

Nissan 370Z MOT Results

Registered in 2010
84.5% pass rate
from 640 tests in 2021
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 370Z is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.1% fail on Suspension (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.31% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.31% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 1.9% fail on Brakes (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Mechanical brake components (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake linings and pads (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Brake performance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
  • 0.31% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Steering
    • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages