Nissan 370Z MOT Results

Registered in 2010
89.8% pass rate
from 723 tests in 2020
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 370Z is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Visibility (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.97% fail on Washers
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp aim (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Position lamps (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Position lamp (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 1.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Integral vehicle structure (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Strengthening plate (800 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.2% fail on Suspension (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.41% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
  • 0.69% fail on Brakes (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Mechanical brake components (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.14% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.14% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.14% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.28% fail on Brake performance (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 0.55% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust emissions (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.55% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.28% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.14% fail on Rams
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages