Nissan 350Z MOT Results
Registered in 200364.7% pass rate
from 709 tests in 2017
(27% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 350Z is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(37% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.85% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Fog lamp (88% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Tell tale
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(53% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp (71% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Battery
-
0.56% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Individual lamps (84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.56% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Horn
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.14% fail on Lamp
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
6.9% fail on
Position lamps
-
8.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.6% fail on Emissions (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Tank
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension
(57% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage condition (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.3% fail on Rear (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Front
-
0.85% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
0.56% fail on
Prescribed areas
(73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Component mounting (74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.42% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
7.5% fail on
Brakes
(54% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Front wheels
- 0.85% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.56% fail on Brake discs
-
2.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(68% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on ABS
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.14% fail on
Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(66% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Valve stem
-
6.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (51% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
-
4.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.28% fail on Passengers airbag (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
-
0.42% fail on
Seat belts
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Power steering
- 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.28% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Drive system
-
0.71% fail on
Steering system
(84% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Steering arm
-
0.14% fail on
Steering control
- 0.14% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.14% fail on Steering operation
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.85% fail on
Power steering
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate
-
0.42% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.42% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.42% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.14% fail on Chassis
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
- 0.14% fail on Drivers
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Drivers
-
0.14% fail on
Vehicle structure