Nissan 300ZX MOT Results

Registered in 1994
67.3% pass rate
from 55 tests in 2020
(4.1% better than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 300ZX is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (200% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Switch
    • 9.1% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim (60% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim (71% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.8% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (89% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.8% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.3% fail on Brakes (33% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.8% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (69% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Operation
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 1.8% fail on Pump
  • 7.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility (15% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (6.9% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (19% worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (24% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
  • 3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition

Search Good Garages