Nissan 200SX MOT Results

Registered in 1999
72.4% pass rate
from 268 tests in 2020
(38% better than other 1999 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Nissan 200SX is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.75% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.37% fail on Springs
      • 0.37% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.75% fail on Switch
    • 0.37% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.37% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 9.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 9.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.75% fail on Emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Catalytic converter (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.75% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.75% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.75% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Other components
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.37% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.37% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 5.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Airbags
      • 0.37% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.75% fail on Chassis
      • 0.75% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.75% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.75% fail on Wipers (83% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages