Morgan +4 MOT Results
Registered in 201682.3% pass rate
from 124 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Morgan +4 is unusually good or bad.
-
8.9% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (32 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
- 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
-
4.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.81% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.81% fail on Brake discs
-
0.81% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
8.9% fail on
Brake performance
(11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Reversing lamps
(34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Reversing lamps (35 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
(22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.81% fail on Horn
-
0.81% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.81% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.81% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering
(10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering gear
(117 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Steering rack (92 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Operation
-
3.2% fail on
Steering gear
(117 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Visibility
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.81% fail on Wipers
-
0.81% fail on
Suspension
-
0.81% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.81% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.81% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.81% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.81% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.81% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.81% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.81% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.81% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.81% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.81% fail on
Exhaust emissions