Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2003

43.8% pass rate

from 96 tests in 2021

(29% worse than other 2003 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

30% fail on Suspension (79% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 15% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 4.2% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.2% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.0% fail on Suspension arm
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 2.1% fail on Springs
  - 2.1% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.1% fail on Coil spring
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
  - 1.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
  - 1.0% fail on Ball joint
19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 7.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 7.3% fail on Headlamp
- 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.1% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
18% fail on Brakes
- 9.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2003 cars)
    - 8.3% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      - 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
      - 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.0% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.1% fail on Brake pads
- 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 1.0% fail on Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 13% fail on Spark ignition
    - 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 6.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.0% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 1.0% fail on NOx sensor
    - 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.1% fail on Transmission
  - 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.1% fail on Joints
- 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.1% fail on Chassis
  - 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.0% fail on Bumpers
- 1.0% fail on Load security
  - 1.0% fail on Tailgate
    - 1.0% fail on Tailgate condition
9.4% fail on Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Condition
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
8.3% fail on Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Bonnet
4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.2% fail on Seat belts
  - 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
3.1% fail on Steering
- 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.1% fail on Ball joint (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Track rod end
2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 2.1% fail on Registration plates