Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.3% pass rate
from 191 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.52% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.52% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.52% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.52% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.52% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 17% fail on Visibility (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 6.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.0% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.52% fail on Cable
        • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.6% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.0% fail on Lever
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
    • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Engine mounting condition (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.52% fail on Towbar
      • 0.52% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.52% fail on Body
      • 0.52% fail on Panel
    • 0.52% fail on Cabs
      • 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.52% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering
      • 0.52% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages