Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.5% pass rate
from 281 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.71% fail on Battery
    • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.71% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.71% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.36% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Tell tale
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Attachment
    • 6.4% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.71% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 5.0% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Hub components
      • 4.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.2% fail on Components
        • 3.2% fail on Pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 7.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 6.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Cap
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.71% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.71% fail on Chassis
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.36% fail on Passengers
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.71% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Steering system (84% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages