Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.3% pass rate
from 88 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 28% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 28% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Other leaks
  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.1% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.1% fail on Hand lever
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.0% fail on Steering
    • 6.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages