Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.6% pass rate
from 139 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.72% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.72% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Fog lamp
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.9% fail on Spring mounting (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 3.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.72% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.72% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.0% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
      • 0.72% fail on Leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.72% fail on Restricted movement
  • 16% fail on Tyres (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 12% fail on Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 12% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.72% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.72% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.5% fail on Steering
    • 6.5% fail on Steering system
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.72% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition
    • 0.72% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.72% fail on Seats
      • 0.72% fail on Passengers
    • 0.72% fail on Load security
      • 0.72% fail on Access panel
  • 4.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Requirements

Search Good Garages