Mitsubishi Space Wagon MOT Results

Registered in 1998
44.2% pass rate
from 77 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Wagon is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Battery
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (91% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 14% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
  • 13% fail on Steering (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Components
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.8% fail on Washers
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres
    • 7.8% fail on Condition
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
  • 2.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.3% fail on Towbars
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Requirements

Search Good Garages