MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Space Star » 2005

Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Results

Registered in 2005
50.3% pass rate
from 1,034 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Star is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 12% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Pipes (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Hoses (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.9% fail on Hub components (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.87% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Cable
      • 0.097% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
        • 0.29% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 3.1% fail on Coil springs (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.097% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Front
      • 0.19% fail on Rear (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.29% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.097% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear lamps (86% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.68% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.58% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Battery
    • 0.097% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.097% fail on Switch
    • 0.097% fail on Horn
    • 0.097% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.097% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.097% fail on Operation
      • 0.097% fail on Drive system
      • 0.097% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.097% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.97% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.29% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.29% fail on Chassis
    • 0.29% fail on Body condition
    • 0.29% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.097% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.097% fail on Load security
      • 0.097% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.48% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.097% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.097% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages