MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Space Star » 2002

Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.5% pass rate
from 481 tests in 2021
(27% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Star is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.4% fail on Springs
      • 4.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.42% fail on Axles
      • 0.42% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.21% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.62% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.42% fail on Switch
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.42% fail on Joints
    • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 0.83% fail on Chassis
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.83% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.62% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.62% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.21% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on View to rear
      • 0.83% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.5% fail on Steering (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 3.7% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.42% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Speedometer (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages