Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.4% pass rate
from 852 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Star is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.70% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bar (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 4.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 4.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.59% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.70% fail on Suspension rods (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Switch (49 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.12% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 21% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
        • 0.12% fail on Linkage
    • 2.5% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
      • 0.35% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.35% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.35% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.35% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.59% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Other passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 1.3% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.82% fail on Chassis
      • 0.82% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.12% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.12% fail on Other tailgate component
  • 9.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.7% fail on Spark ignition (34% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.70% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Condition (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.12% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.12% fail on Components
    • 2.5% fail on Steering gear (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.70% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.82% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.82% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.12% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages