Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Results

Registered in 2000
38.2% pass rate
from 110 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 2000 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Space Star is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 9.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 25% fail on Brakes (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 8.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt
          • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.91% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.8% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.8% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 6.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 0.91% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.91% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.91% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.91% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 11% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.91% fail on Hose
      • 0.91% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.91% fail on Undertray
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.91% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.91% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.91% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.91% fail on Power steering
      • 0.91% fail on Operation
  • 2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp

Search Good Garages