Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.2% pass rate
from 1,709 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.0% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.53% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.82% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (26 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.059% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.64% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Hand lever (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.29% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.059% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Washers
    • 0.059% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.059% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.059% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.70% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket (24 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.059% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.059% fail on Horn
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.18% fail on Stop lamp
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.99% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.059% fail on Size/type
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Suspension
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.059% fail on Springs
      • 0.059% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.059% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.059% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.059% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.35% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar (120 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Safety device
      • 0.059% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.059% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.059% fail on Pipe
    • 0.059% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.059% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.059% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.059% fail on Undertray
  • 0.23% fail on Steering
    • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel (30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.059% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.059% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.23% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.18% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.059% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.059% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.059% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.059% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.059% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.059% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages