Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2016

85.5% pass rate

from 1,651 tests in 2021

(16% better than other 2016 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

5.4% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (55% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 2.5% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.61% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.61% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.061% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.061% fail on Lever
- 1.6% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.85% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.79% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      - 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.061% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.061% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.18% fail on Rbt
      - 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.061% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.061% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.91% fail on Rigid brake pipes (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.24% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.061% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.061% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.061% fail on Hand lever
- 0.061% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.061% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.061% fail on Other components
3.8% fail on Visibility
- 2.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers
- 0.12% fail on View to rear
  - 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.061% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.061% fail on Windscreen
2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 0.85% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.42% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.30% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim (74% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim (78% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.061% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.36% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.36% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Battery(ies) (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.18% fail on Position lamps (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Position lamp (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.061% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.061% fail on Individual direction indicators
2.2% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
- 0.79% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2016 cars)
2.0% fail on Suspension
- 0.85% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (57 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.061% fail on Ball joint
- 0.48% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.42% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.061% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.18% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    - 0.18% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Suspension rods (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (66 times worse than other 2016 cars)
0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.42% fail on Registration plates
0.30% fail on Steering
- 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.18% fail on Track rod end
- 0.12% fail on Power steering (28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Other components (183 times worse than other 2016 cars)
0.24% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% better than other 2016 cars)
  - 0.18% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.061% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.061% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
0.12% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.12% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.12% fail on Condition
0.12% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
0.061% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.061% fail on Bumpers

Read the Honest John Review

Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat. Spacious cabin and seven seats. Most versions well equipped. Very reliable.