Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2012

75.0% pass rate

from 744 tests in 2021

(17% better than other 2012 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

9.4% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% worse than other 2012 cars)
    - 3.6% fail on Brake pads (76% worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.40% fail on Brake discs
- 3.8% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (36 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      - 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (37 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.81% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.13% fail on Rbt
      - 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.67% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.67% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
  - 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.13% fail on Pedal
  - 0.13% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
7.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.3% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.94% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.67% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.94% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2012 cars)
    - 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.27% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.27% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.13% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.13% fail on Position lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
6.2% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2012 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Springs
  - 2.8% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.8% fail on Coil spring
- 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.7% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.67% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.13% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint
3.4% fail on Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.13% fail on Windscreen
2.7% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.94% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2012 cars)
2.4% fail on Steering
- 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.54% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.54% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Other components (35 times worse than other 2012 cars)
2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.13% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.13% fail on Tank
- 0.13% fail on Boot lid
  - 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 1.9% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
    - 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.13% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
  - 0.13% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
0.67% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.13% fail on Condition
0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates
0.40% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat. Spacious cabin and seven seats. Most versions well equipped. Very reliable.