MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2011

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2011
66.0% pass rate
from 1,182 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (94% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps (47% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp levelling device (10 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.76% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.51% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.085% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.085% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.085% fail on Horn
    • 0.085% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.085% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.085% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.085% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.085% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.085% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.085% fail on Switch
    • 0.085% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (67% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (16 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.085% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.085% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.93% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.085% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.42% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (60% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.085% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.085% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.25% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.085% fail on Pedal
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.085% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.085% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.085% fail on Other components
  • 8.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.93% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.085% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.085% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.085% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.085% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.085% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.085% fail on Levelling valve
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.085% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.085% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.085% fail on View to rear
      • 0.085% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.2% fail on Steering (72% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.85% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Other components (25 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses (13 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Operation
      • 0.085% fail on Pump
      • 0.085% fail on Rams
    • 0.085% fail on Steering column
    • 0.085% fail on Steering play
      • 0.085% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (48% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.51% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Tank (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.085% fail on Hose
    • 0.42% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts (65% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.085% fail on Towbar
      • 0.085% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.085% fail on Body
      • 0.085% fail on Other body component
  • 1.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.59% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Spark ignition (89% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.68% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat. Spacious cabin and seven seats. Most versions well equipped. Very reliable.

    Search Good Garages