Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.8% pass rate
from 1,220 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.082% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.082% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.082% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 12% fail on Brakes (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Brake discs (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.082% fail on Lever
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.49% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.082% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt
          • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.41% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.41% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.082% fail on Servos
    • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.082% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.082% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.082% fail on Additional braking device
  • 6.1% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.90% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.33% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Axles
      • 0.082% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.082% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.082% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.082% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.082% fail on View to rear
      • 0.082% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.82% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.082% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.082% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.082% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.16% fail on Spark ignition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.082% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Size/type
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.33% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.082% fail on Chassis
      • 0.082% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.082% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Bracket
    • 0.082% fail on Seats
      • 0.082% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.082% fail on Undertray
  • 0.74% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.41% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages