Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2010

75.2% pass rate

from 1,076 tests in 2017

(15% better than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 3.9% fail on Position lamps
  - 2.6% fail on Front lamps
  - 1.7% fail on Rear lamps (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.093% fail on All position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.65% fail on Headlamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.56% fail on Headlamp levelling device (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.37% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device (39 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket (30 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.19% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.093% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.093% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.093% fail on Horn
9.5% fail on Brakes (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Hub components (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Brake pads (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.093% fail on Brake calipers
- 3.6% fail on Brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Rear wheels
  - 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.37% fail on Brake imbalance
  - 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.093% fail on Gradient hand brake
  - 0.093% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 2.5% fail on Pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.28% fail on Hoses
    - 0.093% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.093% fail on Operation
  - 0.093% fail on Leaks
- 0.74% fail on Parking brake
  - 0.74% fail on Condition
- 0.56% fail on ABS
- 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.19% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.093% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.093% fail on Pedal
    - 0.093% fail on Anti-slip
4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
- 0.093% fail on Mirrors
4.3% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Coil springs (43% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.56% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  - 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.093% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.46% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.46% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.37% fail on Trailing arms
  - 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  - 0.093% fail on Attachment
- 0.28% fail on Drive shafts
  - 0.28% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 0.28% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.093% fail on Front
  - 0.093% fail on Rear
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Torque/reaction arms
  - 0.093% fail on Attachment
- 0.093% fail on Front suspension joints
3.0% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Size/type
1.6% fail on Steering
- 1.0% fail on Steering system
  - 0.65% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.46% fail on Track rod end
- 0.37% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.28% fail on Operation (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Steering control
  - 0.093% fail on Steering coupling
    - 0.093% fail on Universal joint
- 0.093% fail on Steering operation
0.93% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
- 0.46% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
  - 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.46% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.46% fail on Condition
0.65% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 0.65% fail on Registration plate
0.46% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
0.19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.093% fail on Tank
  - 0.093% fail on System
0.093% fail on Towbars
- 0.093% fail on Towbar
0.093% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.093% fail on Body condition

Read the Honest John Review

Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.