Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200967.5% pass rate
from 764 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Hub components
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Brake discs
- 0.26% fail on Brake calipers
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Components
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Hoses
- 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.13% fail on Leaks
-
2.6% fail on
Components
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.79% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.39% fail on
Pedal
- 0.39% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Pedal
- 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.13% fail on ABS
-
6.8% fail on
Hub components
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front lamps (60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on All position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device (69 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Individual lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Battery
- 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Lamp
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.9% fail on Condition
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
0.79% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.79% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
0.39% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.26% fail on Front
- 0.13% fail on Rear
- 0.39% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension arms
(86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.13% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.13% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.13% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
-
5.9% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 0.52% fail on Windscreen
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
-
0.79% fail on
Power steering
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Other components (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Steering operation
- 0.13% fail on Locking devices
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Tyres
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.65% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Pipe (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Tank (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.65% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.65% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.65% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.65% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.52% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.52% fail on Registration plate
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
0.13% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.