Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200962.5% pass rate
from 781 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(64% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.38% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.26% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(76% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs
-
4.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.90% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.77% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.38% fail on Hand lever
- 0.26% fail on Pedal
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.38% fail on Lever
- 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.13% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.13% fail on Servos
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
(45% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
4.6% fail on
Springs
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.5% fail on Coil spring
- 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.64% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
4.6% fail on
Springs
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.64% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.51% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
8.7% fail on
Steering
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Steering gear
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Power steering
- 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.13% fail on Other components
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
6.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.13% fail on System
-
0.64% fail on
Transmission
(67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.13% fail on Other body component
-
0.13% fail on
Chassis
- 0.13% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Towbar
- 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.13% fail on Hinge
-
0.13% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.13% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.13% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
-
4.9% fail on
Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
-
4.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Emission control equipment
(24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Particulate filter (70 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.51% fail on
Spark ignition
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.26% fail on Other leaks (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.77% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.77% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.77% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.77% fail on Registration plates
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat. Spacious cabin and seven seats. Most versions well equipped. Very reliable.