Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2009

62.5% pass rate

from 781 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Brake performance (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 4.7% fail on Rbt (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.51% fail on Rbt
      - 0.38% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 4.7% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.90% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.77% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.38% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.26% fail on Pedal
- 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.38% fail on Lever
- 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
  - 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
13% fail on Suspension
- 4.6% fail on Springs
  - 4.5% fail on Coil springs
    - 4.5% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.3% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.13% fail on Suspension arm
- 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.64% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.64% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.13% fail on Axles
  - 0.13% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.51% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.13% fail on Horn
- 0.51% fail on Direction indicators (74% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.51% fail on Flashing type (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.26% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.26% fail on Position lamp
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
8.7% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Power steering
  - 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Operation
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
- 0.13% fail on Steering play
  - 0.13% fail on Steering rack
5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.77% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Pipe
  - 0.13% fail on System
- 0.64% fail on Transmission (67% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.26% fail on Body
  - 0.13% fail on Panel
  - 0.13% fail on Other body component
- 0.13% fail on Chassis
  - 0.13% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
- 0.13% fail on Towbar
  - 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.13% fail on Doors
  - 0.13% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.13% fail on Hinge
- 0.13% fail on Seats
  - 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.13% fail on Boot lid
  - 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
4.9% fail on Visibility
- 3.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.1% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.90% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Emission control equipment (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.51% fail on Particulate filter (70 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.26% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  - 0.51% fail on Spark ignition (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.51% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.26% fail on Other leaks (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
4.7% fail on Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.77% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.38% fail on Condition
- 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.77% fail on Registration plates
0.38% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat. Spacious cabin and seven seats. Most versions well equipped. Very reliable.