Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2009
67.5% pass rate
from 764 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Hub components (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Brake pads (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake calipers
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device (69 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.79% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Battery
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Trailer electrical socket (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
  • 6.7% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 0.39% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.26% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.13% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 5.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.8% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.79% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Other components (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Operation (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.13% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pipe (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Tank (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.65% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.65% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.65% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals. A lot of car for the money.

    Search Good Garages