MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2009

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2009
64.7% pass rate
from 827 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.97% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.97% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.85% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 9.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.36% fail on Decelerometer (35 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.12% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.12% fail on Other braking system component
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.85% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.12% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.36% fail on Emission control equipment (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Particulate filter (47 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.60% fail on Spark ignition (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.60% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Chassis
      • 0.12% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.12% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages