Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2008
61.9% pass rate
from 1,337 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (56% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (83% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (81% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.075% fail on Brake drums
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.52% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.075% fail on Pedal
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.075% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.075% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp levelling device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.67% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (74% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (74% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.075% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
      • 0.075% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.075% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Ball joint (90% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.8% fail on Springs (40% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Coil springs (40% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Coil spring (40% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (88% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.97% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.075% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.075% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.075% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.075% fail on Levelling valve
  • 7.7% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.075% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
    • 0.075% fail on Steering wheel
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (98% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Tank (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on System
      • 0.075% fail on Hose
    • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure (95 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Transmission (94% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts (94% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints (94% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Body
      • 0.075% fail on Other body component
    • 0.075% fail on Seats
      • 0.075% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (99% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emission control equipment (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Particulate filter (21 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.075% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.82% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (46% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Size/type
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.52% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment
  • 0.075% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.075% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages