MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2008

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2008
59.8% pass rate
from 1,230 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.6% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (50% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Springs (36% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs (36% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring (37% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (84% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.41% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.081% fail on Ball joint
  • 12% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.41% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.081% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (49% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (91% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.081% fail on Cable
        • 0.081% fail on Lever
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.73% fail on Electronic stability control (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.081% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (70% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Trailer electrical socket (27 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.081% fail on Locking devices
    • 3.9% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
    • 0.081% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.081% fail on Steering column
    • 0.081% fail on Steering play
      • 0.081% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Transmission (64% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Hose
    • 0.49% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.081% fail on Body
      • 0.081% fail on Other body component
    • 0.081% fail on Doors
      • 0.081% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Catch
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.16% fail on Other emission control equipment (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.081% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition (84% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.081% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2008 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.98% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.

    Search Good Garages