Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2008
67.3% pass rate
from 1,185 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (20% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Front lamps (39% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device (40 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.084% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.84% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.42% fail on Battery
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 12% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Hub components (66% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (82% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.084% fail on Brake back plates
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.34% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake operation (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Components (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.084% fail on Operation
    • 0.76% fail on ABS
    • 0.59% fail on Electronic stability system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.084% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.084% fail on Cable
  • 9.9% fail on Suspension (27% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (48% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.76% fail on Rear
      • 0.51% fail on Front
    • 0.68% fail on Trailing arms (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers (68% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front drive shafts (78% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Constant velocity joints (78% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.084% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.084% fail on Levelling valve
    • 0.084% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.084% fail on Condition
  • 6.5% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Steering control
      • 0.084% fail on Steering column
    • 0.084% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.68% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.93% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Tank (28 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.084% fail on Hose
      • 0.084% fail on Pipe
    • 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.084% fail on Emissions
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.93% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.51% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.34% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.17% fail on Body condition
    • 0.084% fail on Seats
      • 0.084% fail on Passengers
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals. A lot of car for the money.

    Search Good Garages