Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200656.8% pass rate
from 2,535 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(28% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(39% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.99% fail on Pins and bushes (61% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
7.3% fail on
Springs
(43% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(44% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Coil spring (45% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(44% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage
- 0.039% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (66% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.039% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.99% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.039% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.12% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.079% fail on Ball joint
- 0.039% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.039% fail on
Axles
- 0.039% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
7.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(39% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(16% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(44% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.079% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.039% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.039% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(44% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(43% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
- 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.47% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.079% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.039% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.039% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.47% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
(79% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.079% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.079% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.32% fail on
Rbt
(79% better than other 2006 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(45% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (46% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads (40% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Brake linings
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(41% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(100% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (92% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.36% fail on Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Hand lever
-
0.55% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.55% fail on Lever
-
0.32% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
(31 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (93 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Other braking system component (20 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Other components
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
(31 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.16% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.039% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.12% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.039% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.039% fail on Leaks
- 0.039% fail on Servos
- 0.039% fail on Load sensing valves
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% better than other 2006 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(50% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.79% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.079% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.71% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Direction indicators
(82% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.47% fail on
Flashing type
(82% better than other 2006 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Steering
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(93% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Track rod end (94% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
0.039% fail on
Other components
- 0.039% fail on Steering linkage
-
4.5% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Steering box
-
0.20% fail on
Power steering
- 0.12% fail on Other components
- 0.079% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.079% fail on
Steering play
- 0.079% fail on Steering box (22 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(93% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Transmission
(60% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(63% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.039% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.20% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(63% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Fuel system
(130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Pipe (11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.91% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Strengthening plate
- 0.32% fail on Bumpers
-
0.32% fail on
Body
- 0.28% fail on Other body component
- 0.039% fail on Panel
-
0.28% fail on
Cabs
(11 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Steps (55 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Towbar
(13 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Towbar condition (22 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.039% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.16% fail on Undertray
-
0.12% fail on
Doors
(73% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.079% fail on Door condition
-
0.039% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.039% fail on Hinge
-
0.079% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.039% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.039% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.039% fail on Floor
-
0.039% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.039% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.6% fail on
Visibility
(19% better than other 2006 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.039% fail on Driver's view
- 0.039% fail on Bonnet
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
(36% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth (31% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Size/type
-
3.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(39% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.39% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.039% fail on Other leaks
-
0.039% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.039% fail on Undertray
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.079% fail on Attachment
- 0.67% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2006 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.36% fail on Attachment
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.