Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200661.5% pass rate
from 2,530 tests in 2017
(8.5% better than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(32% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Condition (34% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.079% fail on Attachment
- 0.040% fail on Condition
- 3.9% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(49% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (49% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.12% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.91% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Rear (70% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
0.83% fail on
Prescribed areas
(90% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Component mounting (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.040% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.71% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Front drive shafts
(75% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.079% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
0.040% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
6.5% fail on
Coil springs
(32% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(32% better than other 2006 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Position lamps
(21% better than other 2006 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Front lamps (31% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Direction indicators
(74% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Individual lamps (75% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.040% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.67% fail on
Flashing type
(74% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Battery
-
0.51% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.51% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.47% fail on
Headlamps
(87% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Horn
- 0.079% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.079% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.079% fail on Lamp
- 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.040% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.1% fail on Front wheels (63% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (32% better than other 2006 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.079% fail on Brake operation
- 0.079% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.040% fail on Gradient hand brake
- 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
- 0.24% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.040% fail on Brake back plates
-
3.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.1% fail on
Components
- 2.9% fail on Pipes
- 0.20% fail on Hoses
- 0.079% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.24% fail on Leaks
- 0.079% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.040% fail on Operation
-
3.1% fail on
Components
- 0.75% fail on ABS
-
0.63% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.63% fail on Condition
- 0.51% fail on Electronic stability system (150% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Service brake control components
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Pedal
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.040% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.040% fail on Cable
-
0.040% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.040% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
5.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.0% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Windscreen
- 0.16% fail on Mirrors
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
(34% better than other 2006 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Valve stem
- 0.040% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.1% fail on Emissions
-
0.67% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on System
- 0.16% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Hose
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.71% fail on Steering rack
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
-
0.040% fail on
Power steering
- 0.040% fail on Other components
- 0.040% fail on Locking devices
- 0.040% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
-
2.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
-
1.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.040% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.91% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.32% fail on
Doors
- 0.32% fail on Passengers other
- 0.28% fail on Body condition
- 0.12% fail on Body security
-
0.079% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.079% fail on Chassis
- 0.040% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.040% fail on Speedometer
-
0.040% fail on
Seats
- 0.040% fail on Passengers
-
0.32% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
-
0.32% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.32% fail on Registration plate
-
0.079% fail on
Towbars
(9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Towbar (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.