MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2005

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.3% pass rate
from 3,158 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Springs (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Coil springs (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Coil spring (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.032% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (56% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 6.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (24% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (51% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.98% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.095% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.032% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
  • 15% fail on Brakes (12% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.25% fail on Decelerometer (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.032% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.032% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 3.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.92% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.66% fail on Lever
    • 0.60% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (46 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Other braking system component (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.032% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.095% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.032% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.095% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.032% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.032% fail on Servos
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Individual direction indicators (54% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.51% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Position lamp (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.095% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.095% fail on Switch
    • 0.032% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.032% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.032% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.095% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.095% fail on Joints
      • 0.032% fail on Halfshafts
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.85% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.063% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Steps (47 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.032% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.032% fail on Towbar
      • 0.032% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.032% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.032% fail on Load security
      • 0.032% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.032% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.032% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.032% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.032% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 7.9% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Steering box
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.095% fail on Intermediate drop arm (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.032% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
      • 0.032% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Pump
      • 0.032% fail on Rams
    • 0.063% fail on Steering play
      • 0.032% fail on Steering box
      • 0.032% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Steering wheel
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.063% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.032% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.032% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.032% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Spark ignition (90% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested (92% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.032% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.032% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Airbags
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.032% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.063% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.063% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Steps and stairs (96 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Steps (96 times worse than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages