Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2005
60.6% pass rate
from 3,126 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Coil springs (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Condition (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Location
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.5% fail on Front suspension joints (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.096% fail on Linkage condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Spring mounting (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Trailing arms (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
    • 0.45% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Front drive shafts (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Constant velocity joints (88% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.096% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.096% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.064% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.064% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.032% fail on Shackle
    • 0.032% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps (22% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Individual lamps (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.96% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.064% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.64% fail on Battery
    • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Horn (72% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.032% fail on Lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.032% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Brakes (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Front wheels (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.064% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (44% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Components (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Pipes (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.83% fail on Leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.064% fail on Operation
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (32% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.064% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.064% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.9% fail on ABS (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on Restricted movement (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
        • 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.064% fail on Condition
    • 0.064% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.032% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (34% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.96% fail on Washers (70% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.032% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on System
      • 0.032% fail on Hose
    • 0.70% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering system
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.096% fail on Other components
      • 0.064% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 0.032% fail on Steering control
      • 0.032% fail on Steering column
    • 0.032% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
    • 0.67% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (48% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.90% fail on Body condition (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.19% fail on Chassis
    • 0.096% fail on Doors (78% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.096% fail on Seats
      • 0.064% fail on Drivers
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers
    • 0.064% fail on Body security
    • 0.032% fail on Load security
      • 0.032% fail on Loading door
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
  • 0.032% fail on Towbars
    • 0.032% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages