Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200457.6% pass rate
from 3,392 tests in 2021
(5.3% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(21% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(25% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.94% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Suspension arm (72% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.47% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Linkage
- 0.088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.059% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
4.4% fail on
Springs
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.3% fail on Coil spring
- 0.088% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.88% fail on
Other suspension component
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
(73% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.029% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.059% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.029% fail on Ball joint
-
0.029% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(12% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.029% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.44% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance (57% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.56% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.029% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt
(74% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Electronic braking system
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads (60% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.88% fail on Brake discs
- 0.059% fail on Brake drums
-
0.12% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.088% fail on Cable
- 0.029% fail on Lever
-
3.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Prescribed areas
(21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (39 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.059% fail on Other components
-
0.97% fail on
Prescribed areas
(21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever
-
0.47% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.47% fail on Lever
-
0.41% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.18% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.029% fail on Valves
-
0.059% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.059% fail on Servos
-
0.029% fail on
Pressure storage reservoirs
- 0.029% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2004 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(22% better than other 2004 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
(45% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (87% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.91% fail on
Direction indicators
(65% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.91% fail on
Flashing type
(65% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Horn
- 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.41% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.41% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.088% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.029% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.088% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.059% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.059% fail on Switch
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(17% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(60% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Joints (60% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.059% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.059% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(60% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Fuel system
(72% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.62% fail on
Body
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Other body component (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Panel
-
0.32% fail on
Cabs
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Steps (52 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Bumpers
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.088% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
(72% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.029% fail on Door condition
- 0.029% fail on Hinge
-
0.059% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.059% fail on Door condition
-
0.029% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.029% fail on Door condition
-
0.059% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.088% fail on
Towbar
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Other towbar components (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Undertray
-
0.059% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.059% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.059% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.029% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.029% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.029% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.029% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
6.7% fail on
Steering
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Locking devices
- 0.088% fail on Drag link end
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Steering box
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.088% fail on Operation
- 0.088% fail on Other components
- 0.059% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.029% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.029% fail on Flexible coupling
-
0.029% fail on
Steering play
- 0.029% fail on Steering box
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.9% fail on
Visibility
(26% better than other 2004 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers (49% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.088% fail on Mirrors
- 0.029% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.029% fail on Bonnet
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(48% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.088% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.059% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.029% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.029% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.059% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.029% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Spark ignition
(94% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (95% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Catalyst emissions (96% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.12% fail on Other leaks
- 0.059% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.029% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.029% fail on Undertray
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
(63% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.029% fail on Requirements
- 0.50% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
(63% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.71% fail on Registration plates
-
0.47% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.47% fail on Attachment
-
0.088% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
(20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Steps and stairs
(106 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Steps (106 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Steps and stairs
(106 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.029% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.029% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.