Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200358.1% pass rate
from 2,784 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
8.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.072% fail on Attachment
- 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(37% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(39% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.2% fail on Front (68% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Rear (90% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.90% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.036% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.86% fail on
Front drive shafts
(78% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Attachment
-
0.072% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.072% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.072% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
- 0.036% fail on General condition
-
0.036% fail on
Air suspension
- 0.036% fail on Bellows
-
8.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Position lamps
(33% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps (40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.072% fail on All position lamps
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamps
(80% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.036% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.036% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.93% fail on Battery
-
0.79% fail on
Direction indicators
(72% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Individual lamps (59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.036% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.036% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.79% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Tell tale
- 0.29% fail on Horn
-
0.18% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.11% fail on Lamp
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.072% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.036% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
6.3% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Front wheels (38% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (43% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.11% fail on Brake operation
-
5.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(21% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Pipes
- 0.50% fail on Hoses (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.93% fail on Leaks (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(21% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.9% fail on Brake pads
- 0.50% fail on Brake discs
- 0.40% fail on Brake calipers (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Brake back plates
- 2.0% fail on ABS (91% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Restricted movement (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Prescribed areas
(37 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (63 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.57% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.32% fail on
Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Pedal
- 0.29% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.036% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.036% fail on Cable
-
6.3% fail on
Brake performance
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Valve stem
- 0.072% fail on Size/type (79% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
- 0.072% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(36% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Emissions (67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.32% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on System
- 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
- 0.072% fail on Drag link end
- 0.036% fail on Steering box
- 0.036% fail on Steering arm
-
0.036% fail on
Other components
- 0.036% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.25% fail on
Power steering
- 0.14% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.072% fail on Other components
- 0.072% fail on Steering operation
- 0.036% fail on Locking devices
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
-
3.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(78% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Vehicle structure
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Chassis (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Doors
- 0.29% fail on Passengers other
- 0.036% fail on Drivers
- 0.036% fail on Passengers front
- 0.14% fail on Body security
- 0.036% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.036% fail on
Seats
- 0.036% fail on Passengers
-
0.036% fail on
Load security
- 0.036% fail on Tailgate
-
3.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
(75% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Condition
- 0.036% fail on Requirements
-
0.57% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.54% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
(75% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.83% fail on Registration plate
-
0.50% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.50% fail on Attachment
-
0.32% fail on
Towbars
(7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.