Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.5% pass rate
from 2,598 tests in 2020
(13% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (12% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (29% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (31% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Springs
      • 3.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.23% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.077% fail on Sub-frames (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance (23% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (57% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.077% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance (78% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.038% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (66% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Brake discs (50% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Brake drums
    • 3.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.038% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.62% fail on Pedal (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.77% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (44 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Other components
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.038% fail on Valves
    • 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps (29% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp (28% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (59% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.23% fail on Trailer electrical socket (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators (55% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (75% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.038% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.038% fail on Switch
  • 8.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
      • 0.077% fail on Hose
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.077% fail on System
    • 0.96% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.077% fail on Joints
        • 0.038% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.85% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Panel
      • 0.077% fail on Body condition (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.077% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Undertray
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Steps (30 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (80% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
      • 0.038% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.038% fail on Door condition
    • 0.038% fail on Load security
      • 0.038% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.038% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (21% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.038% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.038% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.077% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility (35% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (50% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.077% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.077% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.038% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.077% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.92% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (87% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.81% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.62% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.077% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.038% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.038% fail on Undertray
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts (86% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.077% fail on Requirements
    • 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
  • 0.038% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.038% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages