Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.1% pass rate
from 2,123 tests in 2021
(7.0% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (23% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.094% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.38% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.94% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.66% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames (75% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.047% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (35% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.094% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.047% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (56% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.99% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Prescribed areas (21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (34 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.094% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.047% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.047% fail on Other components
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.047% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.047% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (40% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (65% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.71% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.047% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.42% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.094% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 0.047% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.14% fail on Joints
    • 0.94% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Other body component (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Panel
      • 0.047% fail on Body condition
      • 0.047% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.47% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Hose
      • 0.047% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.094% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.094% fail on Door condition
      • 0.094% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition
        • 0.047% fail on Catch
    • 0.33% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Steps (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.047% fail on Towbar
      • 0.047% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.047% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.047% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (27% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Steering box
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components (32% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.094% fail on Operation
      • 0.047% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.094% fail on Steering play
      • 0.094% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.047% fail on Steering column
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.047% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.094% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.047% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.094% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition (91% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested (87% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.094% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.047% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.047% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.047% fail on Undertray
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.047% fail on Condition
  • 0.094% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Steps and stairs (64 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Steps (74 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.047% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.047% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages