Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200358.1% pass rate
from 2,123 tests in 2021
(7.0% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.66% fail on Ball joint
- 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.38% fail on Linkage
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.094% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.047% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Coil spring
- 0.38% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.94% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.66% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.61% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
(75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.047% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
6.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(35% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.094% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.094% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.047% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.047% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
(35% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.047% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
0.71% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.33% fail on
Parking brake performance
(79% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.14% fail on
Decelerometer
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads (56% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.85% fail on Brake discs
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(54% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (94% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.99% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Prescribed areas
(21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (34 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.047% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.047% fail on Other components
-
0.94% fail on
Prescribed areas
(21 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.38% fail on Hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Pedal
-
0.57% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(170% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.42% fail on Lever
- 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.047% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.047% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.047% fail on Load sensing valves
-
6.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(23% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp (35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(49% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.19% fail on Horn
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.047% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.42% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.42% fail on Position lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.094% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.094% fail on Switch
- 0.047% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Chassis
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Chassis condition (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
(63% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.14% fail on Joints
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Other body component (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Panel
- 0.047% fail on Body condition
- 0.047% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.85% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.47% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Hose
- 0.047% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.38% fail on
Doors
-
0.19% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.19% fail on Door condition
-
0.094% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.094% fail on Door condition
-
0.094% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.047% fail on Door condition
- 0.047% fail on Catch
-
0.19% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.33% fail on
Cabs
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steps (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
-
0.047% fail on
Towbar
- 0.047% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.047% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.047% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
(27% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
-
3.5% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Steering box
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(32% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Drag link end
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.33% fail on
Power steering
- 0.19% fail on Other components
- 0.094% fail on Operation
- 0.047% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.094% fail on
Steering play
- 0.094% fail on Steering rack
- 0.047% fail on Steering column
-
3.5% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.047% fail on Size/type
-
4.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(49% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(51% better than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.094% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.047% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.094% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.57% fail on
Spark ignition
(91% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested (87% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Compression ignition
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.61% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.094% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.047% fail on Other leaks
-
0.047% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.047% fail on Undertray
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.047% fail on Condition
-
0.094% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
(15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Steps and stairs
(64 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Steps (74 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.094% fail on
Steps and stairs
(64 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.047% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.