Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200253.3% pass rate
from 1,910 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 10% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(35% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.63% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
(29% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Location
-
2.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(98% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.0% fail on Front (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Rear
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Couplings
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.10% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.10% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.052% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.052% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.052% fail on Condition
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(23% better than other 2002 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
6.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
- 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.10% fail on All position lamps
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (25% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2002 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(46% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (45% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.052% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.052% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 1.8% fail on Battery (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Individual lamps (57% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.052% fail on Tell tale
- 0.79% fail on Horn
- 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.052% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.052% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
6.6% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.6% fail on Front wheels
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Brake operation
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.3% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.2% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Pipes
- 0.37% fail on Hoses (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Leaks (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Operation
-
4.2% fail on
Components
(30% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
- 3.5% fail on Brake pads (44% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs
- 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.10% fail on Brake back plates
- 2.6% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(80 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (121 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.99% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.99% fail on Condition
- 0.73% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Service brake control components
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Pedal
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.68% fail on
Pedal
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Brake performance
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
10% fail on
Steering system
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end
- 0.10% fail on Drag link end
- 0.052% fail on Ball joint
-
0.47% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Other components
- 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.10% fail on Rams
- 0.052% fail on Operation
-
0.10% fail on
Steering control
- 0.052% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.052% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.052% fail on Universal joint
- 0.10% fail on Steering operation
- 0.052% fail on Locking devices
-
10% fail on
Steering system
(130% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2002 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition (41% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Size/type
- 0.052% fail on Valve stem
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(25% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
(88% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.47% fail on System
- 0.37% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Hose
- 0.052% fail on Cap
- 0.89% fail on Emissions (74% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(43% better than other 2002 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Wipers (29% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen
- 0.26% fail on Mirrors
-
5.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(82% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(140% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Chassis (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Doors
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Passengers other
-
0.10% fail on
Load security
- 0.10% fail on Tailgate (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.052% fail on Speedometer
- 0.052% fail on Spare wheel
-
4.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
(70% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas (87% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Requirements
-
0.26% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(85% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.26% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (84% better than other 2002 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
(70% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.79% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Towbars
(7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Vehicle structure (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Towbar
-
0.37% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(68% better than other 2002 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Registration plate (68% better than other 2002 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.