MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 2002

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2002
57.6% pass rate
from 1,238 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension (25% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.081% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Springs
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs (38% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.57% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.081% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.081% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.081% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (45% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.97% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on Rbt
          • 0.081% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.081% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.081% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.081% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (32 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Other components
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
      • 0.081% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.081% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (24% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
        • 0.081% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.97% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank
      • 0.32% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.081% fail on Hose
    • 0.73% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Steps
    • 0.65% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.081% fail on Body condition
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Undertray
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.081% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
      • 0.081% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
    • 0.081% fail on Towbar
      • 0.081% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.081% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.081% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 11% fail on Steering (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Steering box
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.16% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
    • 0.081% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.081% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.081% fail on Steering column
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility (40% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.081% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.081% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.081% fail on View to rear
      • 0.081% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.2% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (51% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition (70% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.081% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Size/type
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.73% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment
    • 0.081% fail on Condition
  • 0.081% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.081% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.081% fail on Steps
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages