Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.6% pass rate
from 583 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage
      • 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.51% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Coil spring (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.86% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.69% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.17% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.17% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.69% fail on Pedal
      • 0.51% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.17% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.17% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.51% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.86% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.69% fail on Horn
      • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket (16 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.34% fail on Switch
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.69% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.69% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.17% fail on System
    • 0.69% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.69% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steps
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.34% fail on Other body component
    • 0.34% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.17% fail on Carrier
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 8.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (48% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.34% fail on Transmission oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.5% fail on Steering (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.34% fail on Steering play
      • 0.17% fail on Steering box
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.17% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (73% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.69% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 0.69% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.51% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages