Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results
Registered in 200056.0% pass rate
from 420 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(84% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Chassis
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Transmission
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.8% fail on Joints
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.48% fail on Bumpers
-
0.48% fail on
Cabs
- 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Towbar
- 0.24% fail on Safety device
- 0.24% fail on Floor
-
17% fail on
Suspension
- 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.95% fail on Linkage
- 0.71% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.71% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.71% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.48% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Coil springs
(82% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
-
0.24% fail on
Axles
- 0.24% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.24% fail on Dipswitch
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.95% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.24% fail on Horn
-
0.71% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.48% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.48% fail on Position lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Headlamps
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.24% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(65% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.48% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.24% fail on
Rbt
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
-
0.48% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.48% fail on Brake discs
-
1.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.71% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.71% fail on Pedal
-
0.71% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.24% fail on Servos
- 0.24% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.48% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.48% fail on Lever
- 0.48% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.24% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.1% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
-
0.24% fail on
View to rear
- 0.24% fail on Mirrors
-
5.7% fail on
Steering
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Drag link end
- 0.24% fail on Intermediate drop arm
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Operation
-
4.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(42% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(45% better than other 2000 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(60% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (51% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Spark ignition
(60% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(45% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.95% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.95% fail on Registration plates
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.