Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1999
54.2% pass rate
from 963 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.52% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.31% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.21% fail on Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 6.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.93% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Subframe mounting (73% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Fitment
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Location
    • 0.31% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (38% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Components
        • 7.3% fail on Pipes (74% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Hoses (60% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Valves
        • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.83% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake back plates (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.93% fail on ABS
    • 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.62% fail on Pedal
        • 0.42% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.10% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (59% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Emissions (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Cap
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.4% fail on Seat belts (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas (88% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (27 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point (32 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.21% fail on Free play
        • 0.21% fail on Steering box (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.21% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.83% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.42% fail on Other components
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.10% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.10% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.10% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (62% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.73% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages