MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 1999

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1999
63.2% pass rate
from 500 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission
      • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.60% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
        • 0.20% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Pipe
      • 0.40% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.60% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.40% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
    • 0.40% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.40% fail on Door condition
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.20% fail on Cabs
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp (69% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.40% fail on Main beam tell-tale (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.80% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.60% fail on Springs (75% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.20% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.80% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (72% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.60% fail on Intermediate drop arm (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.20% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.20% fail on Steering play
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages