Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1998
56.0% pass rate
from 1,433 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (84% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.070% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.070% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.84% fail on Horn
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.070% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.070% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.070% fail on Lamp
      • 0.070% fail on Tell tale
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.84% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.42% fail on Subframe mounting (66% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (51% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts (34% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Front drive shafts (34% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (33% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.070% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (38% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.9% fail on Front (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Rear
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.63% fail on Coil springs (70% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (68% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.070% fail on Attachment
    • 0.070% fail on Axles
      • 0.070% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.070% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (43% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Components (29% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Pipes (82% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Hoses (70% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Valves
        • 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance (22% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Front wheels (37% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (49% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.070% fail on Parking brake operation
      • 0.070% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 4.4% fail on Hub components (79% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (97% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (95% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.070% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.98% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.77% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on ABS (56% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.28% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.28% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (71% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Emissions (44% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (98% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Hose
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers
    • 0.070% fail on Body security
  • 8.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.70% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.070% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.070% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (30% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Seat belts (66% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas (75% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (86% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (85% better than other 1998 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.84% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Steering pivot point (15 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.28% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.14% fail on Free play
        • 0.14% fail on Steering box (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.070% fail on Operation
    • 0.42% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Steering control
      • 0.070% fail on Steering shaft
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (59% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (63% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (57% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.70% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages