Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1997
55.5% pass rate
from 1,201 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (88% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.7% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.67% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Individual lamps (75% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.42% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.083% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting (70% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Fitment
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.083% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.083% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.6% fail on Front
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (56% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.00% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.083% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 0.083% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.083% fail on Attachment
    • 0.083% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Components (42% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Pipes (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Valves
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels (42% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components (79% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (80% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.17% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.58% fail on ABS
    • 0.25% fail on Parking brake (76% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (76% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.083% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.083% fail on Pedal
        • 0.083% fail on Condition
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (24% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Emissions (29% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on System (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Cap
      • 0.17% fail on Hose
      • 0.083% fail on Tank
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.083% fail on Drivers
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.083% fail on Passengers
      • 0.083% fail on Drivers
  • 7.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (38% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts (67% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Prescribed areas (79% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
      • 0.083% fail on Requirements
    • 0.083% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.083% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Steering pivot point (14 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering box (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Steering box
      • 0.083% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.083% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.083% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.083% fail on Other components
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.083% fail on Steering control
      • 0.083% fail on Steering column
    • 0.083% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (46% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.67% fail on Towbars (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages