MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 1995

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1995
60.7% pass rate
from 234 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
      • 1.7% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Cabs (13 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Steps
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.43% fail on Hose
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.85% fail on Body
      • 0.85% fail on Mounting fixings (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage
      • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.85% fail on Springs
      • 0.85% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.85% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.43% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.85% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.43% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.43% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.43% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.43% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.43% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.43% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt
          • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.43% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.85% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.43% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.43% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.43% fail on Other braking system component
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (74% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Rams
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
  • 1.3% fail on Tyres
    • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.43% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages