Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.5% pass rate
from 1,109 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.36% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.45% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.090% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.090% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
    • 0.90% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.090% fail on Lamp
      • 0.090% fail on Switch
      • 0.090% fail on Tell tale
  • 19% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Components (58% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Pipes (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Valves (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses (78% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.090% fail on Cylinders
      • 1.8% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (46% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components (78% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.36% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.090% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.90% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.81% fail on ABS
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.090% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.090% fail on Cable
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.090% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.090% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.2% fail on Front (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (52% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (51% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Attachment
    • 0.45% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.090% fail on General condition
    • 0.090% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.090% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.090% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.090% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (30% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Emissions (31% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Fuel system (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Cap (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pipe (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on System
      • 0.45% fail on Hose (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Tank
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Body condition (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Vehicle structure (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Chassis (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Body security
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.090% fail on Passengers
    • 0.090% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.090% fail on Speedometer
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (46% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Seat belts (63% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas (79% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.090% fail on Installation check
        • 0.090% fail on Anchorage's
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.54% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Other components (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.27% fail on Free play
        • 0.27% fail on Steering box (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering box
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.090% fail on Drive system
      • 0.090% fail on Pump
      • 0.090% fail on Other components
    • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering control
      • 0.18% fail on Steering column
      • 0.090% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.090% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.1% fail on Towbars (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Vehicle structure (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages