MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 1994

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1994
61.5% pass rate
from 117 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission
      • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.85% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.85% fail on Joints
    • 2.6% fail on Cabs (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on Pipe
    • 0.85% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.85% fail on Body
      • 0.85% fail on Other body component
    • 0.85% fail on Doors
      • 0.85% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.85% fail on Catch
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.85% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.85% fail on Pedal
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.85% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.85% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.85% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.85% fail on Horn
  • 10% fail on Suspension
    • 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.85% fail on Suspension rod
  • 8.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Compression ignition (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.85% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.85% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.85% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.85% fail on View to rear
      • 0.85% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.85% fail on Steering column
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.85% fail on Tyres
    • 0.85% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages