MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun » 1992

Mitsubishi Shogun MOT Results

Registered in 1992
58.3% pass rate
from 48 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Shock absorbers (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 4.2% fail on Other suspension component (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint (23 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 10% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.2% fail on Body (9 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Other body component (22 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (12 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 2.1% fail on Lever
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
  • 10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 10% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Attachment (48 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 8.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 4.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plates (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages