Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2007
58.5% pass rate
from 986 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2007 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (180% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Pins and bushes (59 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (57% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (57% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring (57% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers (65% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.81% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.81% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.81% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.51% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.20% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other components (11 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.10% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment (160% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Horn
      • 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket (25 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (61% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (100% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Chassis (41 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Chassis condition (41 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.20% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system (7 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (17 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Pipe (11 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
    • 0.61% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Panel
    • 0.41% fail on Cabs (66 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (60 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steps
    • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.30% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar (28 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Vehicle structure (63 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Coupling
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.10% fail on Bracket
    • 0.10% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Washers (80% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
  • 6.9% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Steering linkage components (180% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end (190% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Power steering
      • 0.51% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 0.41% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.41% fail on Steering box (73 times worse than other 2007 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.10% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.51% fail on Spark ignition (86% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (160% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Engine oil leaks (160% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2007 cars)
  • 0.41% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (74% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.10% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.
  • Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
    Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.

    Search Good Garages