Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2007
58.7% pass rate
from 832 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2007 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Pins and bushes (47 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes (57% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (200% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Springs (50% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs (50% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring (50% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Brakes (53% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance (12 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.36% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.96% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Rbt
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (67% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (69% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.72% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (92% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis (20 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition (20 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (4 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Hose (24 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body (5 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Other body component (6 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.48% fail on Cabs (34 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (37 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.72% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.48% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Washers (84% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.2% fail on Steering (71% worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components (120% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (91% worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Drag link end (13 times worse than other 2007 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
        • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.24% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering box (63 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (160% worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 2007 cars)
          • 0.24% fail on Catalytic converter (17 times worse than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition (94% better than other 2007 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on NOx sensor
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (60% better than other 2007 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.24% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2007 cars)
  • 0.84% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.84% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.84% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belt installation check (26 times worse than other 2007 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Belt(s)/padding (47 times worse than other 2007 cars)
  • 0.12% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.12% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.12% fail on Steps
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Shogun (2007 - 2019)
    A rugged hard-worker that can tow heavy loads without breaking sweat and conquer terrain that would faze nearly all of its rivals, spacious cabin and seven seats, reasonably affordable and most version well equipped.
  • Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
    Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.

    Search Good Garages