Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.9% pass rate
from 2,681 tests in 2017
(6.5% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Rear
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts (39% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (40% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Couplings
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Location
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.26% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.037% fail on General condition
    • 0.037% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment
    • 0.037% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 19% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 10% fail on Components (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 10.0% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake imbalance (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Hub components (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.037% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.037% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on ABS
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.075% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.075% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.037% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.037% fail on Cable
    • 0.037% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.037% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.037% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Rear lamps (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.075% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (59% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.037% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.86% fail on Battery
    • 0.86% fail on Horn (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (94% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.075% fail on Lamp
      • 0.075% fail on Switch
    • 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.075% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.075% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Cap
      • 0.19% fail on System
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.3% fail on Steering (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Track rod end (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Steering box (226 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Drag link end (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Free play
        • 0.037% fail on Steering box
      • 0.037% fail on Steering damper
    • 0.67% fail on Power steering (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.075% fail on Rams
      • 0.037% fail on Drive system
      • 0.037% fail on Pump
    • 0.26% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (39% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Size/type
    • 0.037% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Body condition
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Doors (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.037% fail on Drivers
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.075% fail on Seats
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers
      • 0.037% fail on Drivers
    • 0.037% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (58% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (83% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.97% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.93% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Condition
  • 0.22% fail on Towbars (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Vehicle structure (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages