MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Sport » 2005

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.8% pass rate
from 2,839 tests in 2020
(5.6% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Pins and bushes (27 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.035% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.18% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.070% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.070% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.035% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.035% fail on Axles
      • 0.035% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.035% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 17% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rbt (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.035% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (70% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.035% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.035% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.035% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Brake pads (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.035% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.070% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.070% fail on Lever
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
    • 0.85% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.85% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.56% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.035% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.035% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.18% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.070% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.070% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.035% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.035% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.035% fail on Servos
    • 0.035% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.035% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Switch
      • 0.035% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.035% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (74% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (29% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Horn (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Individual direction indicators (94% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.035% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.070% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 0.035% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (45% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Chassis (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission (28% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (27% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (27% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.14% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
        • 0.035% fail on Prop shaft
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Body (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Towbar (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Vehicle structure (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other towbar components (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.21% fail on Cabs (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Steps (54 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.035% fail on Bracket
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
      • 0.070% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
    • 0.035% fail on Undertray
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.070% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.070% fail on View to rear
      • 0.070% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.035% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.035% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.035% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.035% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
          • 0.035% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.070% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.7% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (50% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Catalyst emissions (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering linkage components (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Intermediate drop arm (51 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Other components
        • 0.035% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.39% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering box (70 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Operation
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Other components
      • 0.035% fail on Pump
    • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering box (44 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (59% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (54% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.74% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.035% fail on Attachment
    • 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
  • 0.035% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.035% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages