MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Sport » 2005

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2005
57.4% pass rate
from 2,253 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Pins and bushes (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.044% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Springs (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Coil spring (35% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.58% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.089% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.089% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.044% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.089% fail on Sub-frames (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.22% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (68% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (67% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.089% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.089% fail on Parking brake performance (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.98% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.044% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.089% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.044% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.98% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.044% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.18% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Other braking system component (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.044% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.044% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.044% fail on Servos
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (74% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
        • 0.044% fail on Prop shaft
    • 3.9% fail on Chassis (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Chassis condition (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tank (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.089% fail on System
    • 0.53% fail on Body
      • 0.36% fail on Other body component (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Panel
      • 0.044% fail on Body condition
    • 0.53% fail on Cabs (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.044% fail on Floor
    • 0.044% fail on Seats
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps (31% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (29% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (45% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Battery(ies) (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators (93% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.089% fail on Switch
    • 0.044% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.044% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.18% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Catalytic converter (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.089% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Catalyst emissions (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.044% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.3% fail on Steering (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Steering linkage components (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Other components (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage (25 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.44% fail on Steering box (73 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
      • 0.044% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Other components (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering box (43 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Requirements
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Size/type
  • 0.84% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.84% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.044% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.044% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages