Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results
Registered in 200456.8% pass rate
from 2,722 tests in 2017
(8.7% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (29% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.037% fail on Presence
-
3.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
(90% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(54% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(46% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(46% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (45% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.037% fail on Drive shafts
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
(46% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
(66% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.073% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.037% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.037% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.037% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(24% better than other 2004 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.8% fail on
Position lamps
(29% better than other 2004 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Front lamps (22% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Rear lamps (45% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.037% fail on All position lamps
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (30% better than other 2004 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Fog lamp (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Tell tale
- 0.073% fail on Switch
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
(61% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.037% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.037% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.88% fail on Battery
- 0.84% fail on Horn
- 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Direction indicators
(94% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
(94% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.037% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.037% fail on Tell tales
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
(94% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.11% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.073% fail on Lamp
- 0.037% fail on Switch
- 0.037% fail on Tell tale
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(27% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Hoses (76% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.073% fail on Valves
- 0.44% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Leaks
- 0.15% fail on Operation
-
9.9% fail on
Components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.0% fail on Front wheels (57% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (38% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Parking brake operation
-
5.4% fail on
Hub components
(58% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Brake pads (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Brake discs
- 0.22% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
- 1.1% fail on ABS
-
0.70% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.70% fail on Condition
-
0.40% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.40% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.073% fail on Locking devices (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.037% fail on Cable
-
0.037% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.037% fail on
Components
- 0.037% fail on Pipes
-
0.037% fail on
Components
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.33% fail on Windscreen
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors
- 0.037% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(27% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.4% fail on Emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Tank (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Cap (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.40% fail on System
- 0.22% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.1% fail on
Steering
(44% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Steering system
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Track rod end (61% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering box (80 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Other components
(7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Steering pivot point (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Free play
- 0.037% fail on Steering box
- 0.037% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.037% fail on Steering arm
-
0.40% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Other components
- 0.037% fail on Operation
- 0.037% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.037% fail on Pump
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
- 0.073% fail on Steering operation
- 0.073% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.5% fail on
Steering system
(48% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
(53% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth (48% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Valve stem
- 0.073% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Body condition (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
- 0.073% fail on Tailgate (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Bootlid
- 0.073% fail on Body security
- 0.037% fail on Speedometer
-
0.037% fail on
Doors
- 0.037% fail on Drivers
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(61% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(91% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (90% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.55% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.55% fail on Attachment
-
0.11% fail on
Towbars
- 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.