Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results
Registered in 200454.0% pass rate
from 1,961 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(15% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Pins and bushes (21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Linkage
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 4.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Suspension arm
- 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Springs
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Coil spring (42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(42% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.31% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(25% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Decelerometer
(3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(47% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake performance
(76% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt
(75% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Rbt
(75% better than other 2004 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(34% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(70% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.051% fail on Brake drums
-
0.051% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.051% fail on Cable
-
4.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
-
0.31% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.20% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.15% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Other components
-
0.051% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.051% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.051% fail on Load sensing valves
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(83% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (97% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.9% fail on Joints
- 0.051% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.051% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.31% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.25% fail on Joints
- 0.051% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.051% fail on Belts
-
4.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.0% fail on
Chassis
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.25% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Hose
-
0.76% fail on
Body
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Other body component
- 0.051% fail on Body condition
-
0.71% fail on
Cabs
(16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Steps (36 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Bumpers
-
0.31% fail on
Engine mounting
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.10% fail on Bracket
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.10% fail on Door condition
-
0.051% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.051% fail on Door condition
-
0.10% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.051% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.051% fail on Carrier
-
0.051% fail on
Towbar
- 0.051% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.051% fail on Floor
-
0.051% fail on
Seats
- 0.051% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.051% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.051% fail on Boot lid condition
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.7% fail on Stop lamp (29% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(31% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.56% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.20% fail on Horn
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.61% fail on
Direction indicators
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.10% fail on Position lamp
-
0.051% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.051% fail on Switch
-
0.051% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.051% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
9.7% fail on
Visibility
(23% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Washers (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
-
0.15% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.15% fail on Windscreen
-
0.10% fail on
View to rear
- 0.10% fail on Mirrors
- 0.051% fail on Bonnet
-
7.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.10% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.051% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.051% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (59% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Engine oil leaks (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Other leaks
-
7.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
(45% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(87% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Other components
(13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Steering linkage (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Steering component
- 0.15% fail on Locking devices
- 0.051% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.051% fail on Steering arm
- 0.051% fail on Lock stop
-
0.41% fail on
Power steering
- 0.15% fail on Other components
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.051% fail on Pump
-
0.31% fail on
Steering gear
(65% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Steering box (35 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Steering play
- 0.051% fail on Steering box
-
6.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(87% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Size/type
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Requirements
- 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Road Wheels
(130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates
-
0.051% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.051% fail on
Steps and stairs
- 0.051% fail on Steps
-
0.051% fail on
Steps and stairs
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.