MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Sport » 2003

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2003
55.4% pass rate
from 1,123 tests in 2017
(8.4% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps (33% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps (32% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.089% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (62% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (62% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.89% fail on Horn
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.18% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.089% fail on Lamp
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.71% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (90% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (90% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.6% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.089% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Attachment
    • 0.089% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.089% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems (63% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Components (67% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Hoses (66% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.62% fail on Leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.089% fail on Operation
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.27% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (53% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake back plates (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.089% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.98% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Condition
        • 0.089% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.18% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.089% fail on Rod
      • 0.089% fail on Cable
    • 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.089% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.089% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Cap
      • 0.36% fail on Tank
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on System
      • 0.089% fail on Hose
    • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (45% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering system
      • 4.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering box (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.089% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.089% fail on Other components
        • 0.089% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Pump (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.089% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Size/type
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.089% fail on Drivers
      • 0.089% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.089% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.089% fail on Body security
    • 0.089% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
      • 0.089% fail on Requirements
    • 0.089% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.089% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.089% fail on Towbar
    • 0.089% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages