MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Sport » 2003

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.1% pass rate
from 677 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.30% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.59% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2003 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Cable
    • 3.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Other braking system component (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.15% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.15% fail on Leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
    • 2.8% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.44% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steps
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.15% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.30% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.74% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
      • 0.30% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.44% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 4.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.8% fail on Steering (53% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Steering linkage components (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.44% fail on Other components (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Steering linkage (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Steering component
      • 0.15% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Other components
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts (97% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (60% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.59% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 0.59% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.44% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.15% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages