Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results
Registered in 200258.0% pass rate
from 471 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.42% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
- 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.64% fail on
Rbt
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
0.21% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.21% fail on Lever
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.64% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.64% fail on Hand lever
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.21% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.21% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.21% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.21% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Linkage
- 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.3% fail on
Springs
(65% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Coil spring (63% better than other 2002 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Coil springs
(64% better than other 2002 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.21% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
-
9.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(48% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Transmission
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Joints
- 0.42% fail on Drive shaft (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.21% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.21% fail on Prop shaft
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
(160% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.42% fail on Tank
- 0.21% fail on Pipe
- 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.85% fail on
Body
- 0.85% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Engine mounting
(6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Floor
-
0.21% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.21% fail on Undertray
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.64% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.42% fail on Horn
- 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
-
8.3% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Washers (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
-
8.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
2.8% fail on
Spark ignition
(54% better than other 2002 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
(3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.8% fail on
Steering
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Drag link end
-
0.42% fail on
Steering play
- 0.42% fail on Steering box (33 times worse than other 2002 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.21% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Other components
-
0.21% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.21% fail on Flexible coupling
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.42% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Shogun (1999 - 2007)
Excellent tow car and rugged off-roader. Better ride quality than the previous Shogun.