MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Sport » 2002

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2002
58.0% pass rate
from 471 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.42% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt
          • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.64% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.21% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.21% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.21% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 9.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Linkage
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Springs (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs (64% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring (63% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.21% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.42% fail on Drive shaft (14 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.21% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.21% fail on Prop shaft
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Tank
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.85% fail on Body
      • 0.85% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Engine mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Floor
    • 0.21% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.21% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.21% fail on Undertray
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.42% fail on Horn
      • 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
  • 8.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.8% fail on Spark ignition (54% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.42% fail on Steering play
      • 0.42% fail on Steering box (33 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Other components
    • 0.21% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.21% fail on Flexible coupling
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages