Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2002
54.7% pass rate
from 817 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Horn
      • 0.73% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (90% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.12% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.12% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.12% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 8.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 7.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.61% fail on Lever
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.37% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (78% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Springs
      • 2.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.1% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.12% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.86% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.86% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.98% fail on Body (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Other body component (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.37% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Cabs (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steps
    • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.24% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Washers (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (52% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.12% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.12% fail on Undertray
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Intermediate drop arm (68 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.12% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.61% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
    • 0.49% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.37% fail on Steering box (21 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.86% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages