Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.0% pass rate
from 996 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (29% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (30% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear lamps (80% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Fog lamp (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (79% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Components (80% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 10% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Hoses
        • 0.10% fail on Valves
      • 0.70% fail on Leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.20% fail on Brake back plates (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on ABS
    • 0.50% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Condition
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.10% fail on Components
        • 0.10% fail on Servos
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 9.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.70% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Front (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Coil springs (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Cap
      • 0.20% fail on System
      • 0.10% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.4% fail on Steering
    • 5.9% fail on Steering system
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Steering box (26 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Free play
        • 0.20% fail on Steering box (37 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.20% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.20% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Steering pivot point (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.10% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Body security
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth (35% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (66% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.20% fail on Requirements
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (87% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.80% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.70% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.50% fail on Towbars (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages