Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.0% pass rate
from 255 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.39% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Rear reflectors (19 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Horn
    • 0.39% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition
    • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 7.5% fail on Component mounting (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.4% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Location
    • 0.78% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 8.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.8% fail on Components
        • 7.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.78% fail on Valves
      • 0.78% fail on Leaks
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.39% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.39% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.39% fail on Components
        • 0.39% fail on Pump/compressors
    • 0.39% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Body security
    • 0.39% fail on Doors
      • 0.39% fail on Passengers front
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
      • 0.78% fail on Tank
    • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.5% fail on Washers
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.0% fail on Steering (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Steering system (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Other components (31 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point (39 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Intermediate drop arm (170 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Steering box
      • 0.39% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.39% fail on Locking devices
  • 6.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.39% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.78% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.0% fail on Towbars (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Towbar
  • 0.39% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages