Mitsubishi Shogun Sport MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.0% pass rate
from 171 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.58% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission
      • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Joints
      • 0.58% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.58% fail on Prop shaft
    • 2.9% fail on Chassis
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.58% fail on Tank
      • 0.58% fail on Pipe
    • 2.3% fail on Towbar (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Vehicle structure (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Panel
    • 0.58% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.58% fail on Carrier
    • 0.58% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.58% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.58% fail on Cabs
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.8% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.58% fail on Springs
      • 0.58% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.58% fail on Coil spring
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.58% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.58% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 7.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal
    • 0.58% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.58% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.58% fail on Valves
    • 0.58% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.58% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.58% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.58% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.58% fail on Horn
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Washers
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Window
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.58% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 3.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
  • 5.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.58% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.58% fail on Intermediate drop arm
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
  • 0.58% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.58% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages