Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results
Registered in 200552.7% pass rate
from 740 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
(25% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(45% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Suspension arm (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Ball joint (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(42% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.81% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Linkage
- 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.0% fail on
Springs
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Mounting
- 0.81% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.41% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
15% fail on
Brakes
- 7.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.27% fail on
Decelerometer
(7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.95% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.81% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.81% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
- 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.81% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.81% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Horn
-
0.54% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.54% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(67% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
3.6% fail on
Chassis
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Chassis condition (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.41% fail on Joints
-
0.68% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Body
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
- 0.14% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.81% fail on
Cabs
(26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Steps
-
0.54% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on Hose
- 0.14% fail on Pipe
- 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.27% fail on Bumpers
-
0.27% fail on
Towbar
(22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other towbar components (39 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.41% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.14% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.14% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Airbags
- 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
-
6.1% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.7% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
0.27% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.2% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Steering linkage components
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.95% fail on
Steering linkage components
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Attachment