Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2005
53.6% pass rate
from 1,048 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (65% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (47% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.48% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators (84% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (80% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.095% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Battery
    • 0.095% fail on Horn
    • 0.095% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Components (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Hoses
        • 0.095% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.095% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
      • 0.095% fail on Leaks
    • 7.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (51% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake operation (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.095% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.38% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.29% fail on Brake back plates (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.095% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.095% fail on Condition
    • 0.095% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.095% fail on Pedal
        • 0.095% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.095% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.095% fail on Components
        • 0.095% fail on Pipes
  • 15% fail on Suspension (20% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Component mounting (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spring mounting (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (61% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.29% fail on Front suspension joints (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on General condition
    • 0.095% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.095% fail on Condition
    • 0.095% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.095% fail on Attachment
  • 8.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Tank
      • 0.19% fail on Hose (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Pipe
  • 6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Requirements (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.29% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Vehicle structure (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Body security
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.095% fail on Load security
      • 0.095% fail on Tailgate
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (46% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.1% fail on Towbars (92 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (193 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.86% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Steering system (79% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.095% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.57% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages